The Tools for the job

Frank Massey looks at creating your own tools and methods

By Frank Massey | Published:  01 May, 2017

I gave this topic some considerable thought before choosing to discuss not just a selection of tools we use, but also some tools we have designed and modified.

I guess we all agree on one thing, the continuous demand on tools and technology in virtually every aspect of vehicle diagnosis, repair, and service.

IÂ’m not sure of any other industry that places such demands on technical investment, yet it remains mainly unappreciated by the public. ThatÂ’s our fault! I did spend several years in the aircraft industry on the Panavia Tornado, several years on I often refer to the very similar demands and skill sets required.

 

Gauge interest
The first range of tools are ones we are particularly proud of as we designed them. A range of gauges to measure air and fluid pressures. I donÂ’t want to blow my own trumpet, but focus on the demand and challenges in using them. Some time ago I found it difficult to obtain quality gauges for simple measurements, often those on offer were designed by people who did not fully appreciate the full requirements, and practical application.

Development came progressively over several years, the first to come was a vacuum and turbo boost pressure gauge. We have specialised in performance tuning for many years, assessing engine mechanical efficiency and turbo boost control.

Requirements were a range of -1+2 bar, a tell tail indicator and a non-damped, large clock face. Monitoring turbo pressure can be achieved serially, however unless you can confirm real time pressures against the map sensor, and equally important, the PCM control response in real time, discrete deviations may not be observed. ItÂ’s important that the gauge not be fluid damped as this reduces the response time of the indicator.

I have witnessed sticking variable vanes many times, where serial data has been unable to monitor deviation. We often use two gauges at the same time, one on control value with the other on the charge pressure circuit. At the same time, we monitor PCM control request with a scope, as a suggestion look at current through the actuator it simplifies understanding of mechanical control response.

Prime example
The next gauge development came from our common rail programme, the requirement to monitor low pressure fuel priming. To be accurate we did use a gauge for many years with petrol systems, diesels however increased the demand with the introduction of suction priming. I’m going to make a comment here and expand on it later in the year: there is no such thing as vacuum, it’s simply a pressure lower than atmosphere. Think of it as pressure differential the greater it is the greater the flow potential.  The reverse logic of this is air flow differential creating lift (aeroplanes).

The gauge requirements were for a range of -1+10 bar, Perspex sight block minimum flow diameter 8mm, a ball valve tap to interrupt flow and to be undamped.

The obvious need is to monitor pressure in real time but also flow and the speed in flow response. Additional to this we wanted to restrict flow totally in suction systems, proving system seals integrity and pressure differential to a maximum of absolute zero. the tap also allows for increasing supply pressure whilst monitoring current flow through the low-pressure fuel pump electrical circuit. We call it proof test the increase in pressure and current is normally linear.

So, letÂ’s reverse that logic, you should be able to prove the performance of any fluid system by monitoring rise time and current flow with a scope. this will confirm filtration restriction, cavitation and other issues. The gauge can be used for oil petrol or diesel systems.

Cavitation or voids in the measured fluid are caused by a reduction in flow vis demand, which always lead to component failure be it a fuel pump, turbo or engine.

Under pressure
The last gauge in the kit was born from a simple brief to provide a simple tool to evaluate DPF and exhaust pressure increase.

Its requirements were a range of -1+1 bar, an 8mm/6mm tail hose, damped to smooth exhaust pressure pulse deviations.

ItÂ’s common to have DPF pressure transducer errors, and donÂ’t forget to check adaption or sensor offset serially. the same comments apply to all pressure measurements as PCM control adaption is now pretty much common to all pump systems.

First check the static engine value which should be 1000mb, starting the engine should not produce any increase in pressure. The max pressure on load should not exceed 200-250mb with the ideal a little lower, at approx. 3psi.

We also have a compression gauge modification which we use together with our Pico scope pressure kit for electronic measurement of real time compression engine running, a good subject the next topic.

Want to know more?
The experience and processes developed in our workshop are then built into all our training programmes , all subjects are covered, choice of tools, process and risk assessment form part of the programme , but the most valuable and unique asset is hands on experience over 40 years.

Contact Annette at ads for details 01772 201 597 or visit autoinform.co.uk

 

Frank Massey

 

Related Articles

  • Draper Tools celebrates 100 Years  

    Draper Tools is celebrating 100 years in business. Established in 1919 by Bert Draper, the business is still family owned and run today by the fourth generation of the Draper family.

  • To Scope or Not to Scope? That is the question 

    If you’ve read my technical articles previously then you’ll know that the endgame for our technical training is straightforward. Quite simply our goal is to develop technicians so that they use a repeatable process, carry out root-cause analysis, diagnose the vehicle first time in a timely manner, and ensure that it does not return for the same fault.
        
    Tick the box on those five points more often than not and you’ll have a happy technician, a happy boss, and a satisfied customer. For this to be a regular occurrence though the right elements need to be in place.

    Essential components?
    So what’s required? Obviously a skilled technician, and the right information are essential ingredients, but what about tooling? Can you get by with a scan tool, multimeter, and a copy of Autodata (other technical references are available)? Or is an oscilloscope an essential tool? In this article we’ll take a look how to diagnose a misfire, and whether a scope plays a pivotal part or not.

    Line up your ducks
    The offending vehicle in this instance is a 4 cylinder 1.8 petrol Vauxhall Insignia, although this procedure could apply to any similar petrol vehicle. To say it’s sick would be an understatement. It’s only running on three cylinders, and quite honestly sounds a little sorry for itself. A couple of questions spring immediately to mind. Which cylinder is it? And what’s the overarching cause? Normally a problem like this will be attributed to a mechanical issue, fuelling issue, or ignition related fault. Our purpose at the outset is to quickly identify which of those areas deserves our attention, and to do that we need to carry out some initial high-level tests.
        
    Before we get into what’s causing the problem I like to identify which cylinder is causing the issue. Once I’ve identified that I’ll then drill down to find out why.
        
    You’ve quite a few options on how to achieve this, although my favourite wherever possible is to carry out a cylinder balance test. This is done using a serial tool to deactivate an injector whilst idling and monitor the RPM drop. If there’s no change in rpm for a given cylinder then you’ve found your culprit. On this vehicle, it was identified that cylinder 4 was having little input, and that’s where our focus should be.
        
    Now we know the offending cylinder you’ve three areas to test. On a personal level, I’ll choose a quick mechanical integrity test but the question is: “What’s the quickest way to achieve this? Understanding what cranking speed sounds like on a good car is a benefit, and I’ll normally use a scope to support this with a relative compression test. Using a current clamp (figure 1) to identify a poorly sealing cylinder is a quick test that can give immediate diagnostic direction, but in this case we can see that current draw is equal across all cylinders, and as cranking sounded normal I decided that my time would be better spent looking elsewhere.

    Next steps
    With a quick mechanical integrity check undertaken my gaze turned to ignition. Ignition related misfires are commonplace and there are a number of ways to complete this part of the diagnosis. I could dive in with a scope although I’ll normally look at spark performance with a gap check first, and drill down a little deeper with an oscilloscope if it fails that test.
        
    Figure 2 shows the tool typically used for such a test. The secondary ignition output from all coils was good and equal across all cylinders. If this had not been the case then a scope would have been used to identify why, but in this instance a quick output test showed that all was well and the scope would not be required.
        
    With our previous tests all but eliminating ignition and mechanical faults, it was time to take a look at fuelling faults. The problem on this particular vehicle meant that the cause would be isolated to one cylinder, this made the probability that it’d be a fuel supply issue to the rail less likely. With this in mind it makes sense to use a scope and carry out comparative checks on individual cylinders looking for anomalies that could be caused by a fuelling fault. Access to primary and secondary ignition was less than ideal due to the coil pack configuration so the ignition profile could not be used for fuelling evaluation.
        
    Injector supply, ECU control and circuit current were inspected across all cylinders and while there were small differences nothing was conclusive, until we took a look at rail pressure using the Pico WPS500x pressure transducer. Using this it was plain to see that upon injector number 4 being commanded to open and deliver fuel that there was little drop in rail pressure compared to the other cylinders. This definitely warranted further inspection so the injectors were removed and  a flow test was completed in our test bench. Number 4 injector was found to be delivering significantly less fuel than expected. Bingo, we’d found our misfire.

    To scope or not to scope?
    Effective and efficient diagnosis is all about using the right tool, for the right test, at the correct point in your diagnostic routine, and as this vehicle has shown the oscilloscope plays a critical part in serving up the answers that whilst possible via other methods are often more time consuming to obtain.
        
    If an oscilloscope isn’t playing a major part in your day to day diagnosis then there’s no time like the present to blow the dust from it and start seeing the benefits that this amazing tool will bring to your workshop.


  • Autofirst and RAC team up for new garage network 

    Autofirst Network has joined forces with the RAC in a bid to create the biggest independent garage network in the country.

  • New websites for Dayco 

    Dayco has completely redesigned its websites. In terms of content, the new sites highlight Dayco’s growing product portfolio and technical innovations.

  • Your profitability and how to increase it! 

    If you’re a regular reader of this publication then you may be wondering if there’s been a faux pas and why my usual technical article has migrated to the business section.  If that’s the case fear not, all’s well.   

    I figured that I’d ring the changes and let you into a secret. Many of you know my love for all things technical but I have another passion - building businesses.


Search

Sign Up

For the latest news and updates from Aftermarket Magazine.


Poll

Where should the next Automechanika show be held?



Facebook


©DFA Media 1999-2019