Aftermarket scenario planning

Barnaby looks at the various trends influencing the development of the sector and asks what they might tell us about our future

By Barnaby Donohew | Published:  13 December, 2017

Definition of uncertainty:
a state of having limited knowledge where it is impossible to exactly describe the existing state, a future outcome, or more than one possible outcome.

I don’t know about you but I feel battered by the tsunami of reports describing the technological and social innovations flooding the automotive industry: Alternative fuelling, autonomy, connectivity, over-the-air, vehicle-as-a-device, ride-hailing, shared-ownership, pay-as-you-drive, stores (not dealerships), etc. The list is long. All of this against a backdrop of uncertainty regarding continued access to vehicle data or servicing and repair information.


Antidote to uncertainty
The sum effect is that our future is uncertain. That breeds anxiety. So, how do we get a grip of our situation, part the on-rushing waves, and move forward in our lives and businesses?

Well, whilst we cannot predict the future, if we identify the underlying factors driving the changes within the industry, we can extrapolate emergent trends. Then, from their combined effects, we can have a good stab at predicting our possible futures. This process is known as scenario planning (each possible future is called a scenario). If we describe each scenario in sufficient detail, we can see how our business model might need to evolve to adapt to it. Clearly, the success of the process depends on identifying appropriate industry drivers. From the opening paragraph, we see that there are at least a handful of underlying factors that are driving change: technological innovation, sales centralisation, vehicle ownershipn and vehicle data access solutions. Adaptation to technological innovation is nothing new to the aftermarket, so, in itself, it is not necessarily a threat. Although we could consider all of these factors, we’ll keep it simple and examine the two drivers that could have the greatest effect; vehicle ownership and data access.


Two sides to every story
When extrapolated to their limits, each of the two drivers can suggest trends that may or may not materialise in the future for data access solutions, these are open access to data, as would be available with an internal vehicle platform, or restricted access to data, as would be controlled within an extended vehicle platform. Similarly, for vehicle ownership, there is either the continuation of the status quo or a pivot away from individual ownership.
An internal vehicle platform is the ideal vehicle data solution for the aftermarket as it allows independent workshops to continue to compete against the franchised vehicle manufacturer dealerships, by delivering value to customers that are not necessarily segmented by the manufacturers of their vehicles.

An extended vehicle platform is the ideal solution for the vehicle manufacturers. Access to the vehicle data will likely come with strings attached and the associated cost structures and conditions might limit the vehicles that an aftermarket enterprise is able or authorised to service. In the extreme case, it might be only vehicles from a single manufacturer. A concurrent trend might be that the fate of servicing and repair information is tied up with that of vehicle data, as each is of relatively low value without the other.


Extreme case
Given that vehicle utilisation is low and the cost of ownership is increasing, it is not unreasonable to assume that vehicle ownership patterns might change; in the extreme case, all vehicles might end up being provided as a service by fleet-owning enterprises.
If we systematically combine each of the two trends for each of the two drivers of change, we can build four possible scenarios for the automotive aftermarket; each quadrant within the main figure lists business model changes that might need to be considered for each scenario. The scenarios themselves are described as follows:


A. Business as usual
Free, unmonitored, and open access to vehicle data remains available to the aftermarket, albeit via a secure interface and with new communication technologies. As such, aftermarket diagnostic tools and information sources also remain available. Consumers have rejected on-demand, pay-as-you-go, ride-sharing, and shared or other forms of ownership. Changing vehicle technology remains the main driver of emergent trends and business model evolution. By and large the structure of the aftermarket will be similar to that of today; however, there will be a continual culling of the smallest enterprises, as cost structures relentlessly increase, thereby continuously raising the threshold at which a minimum economy of scale can sustain them.


B. Authorised repairer
Vehicle manufacturers have locked down access to vehicle data. Now, a workshop’s business systems, processes and standards are expected to meet those specified by a vehicle manufacturer. The required investment in key assets and the ongoing cost structures will necessitate a shift to a vehicle-manufacturer-authorised service model. With the vehicle manufacturer’s ongoing rationalisation of dealerships, vehicle sales centralisation, and costs of constructing its own service network, a network of authorised workshops allows them to greatly increase their service capacity whilst simultaneously extending their control of valuable vehicle-related data. The model further helps the vehicle manufacturers to gain a larger market share of the parts supply chain.


C. General fleet maintenance
The increased costs of vehicle ownership relative to their combined utility and social value has reached a tipping point, after which consumers embraced ride-hailing, shared ownership, or pay-as-you-drive services. Vehicles now represent the key assets within the business models of fleet-owning enterprises. Many of these enterprises will seek to form key partnerships with fleet maintenance contractors to outsource their fleet maintenance activities, whereas others will bring the maintenance activities in-house. Open access to vehicle data ensures that independent enterprises are able to compete with both the in-house providers and the vehicle manufacturers for maintenance contracts. Opportunities will exist for these independent enterprises to scale; however, like the vehicle manufacturers, growth will bring increased cost structures, such as those associated with the recruitment and retention of talent. A healthy, but consolidated, aftermarket parts supply chain will exist to service the maintenance activities.


D. Authorised fleet maintenance
With the extended vehicle platform and the collapse of individual ownership, vehicle manufacturers gain tight control of vehicle data and fleet maintenance contracts (including the parts supply chain). Truly independent workshops are rare and serve only those with niche (e.g. classic) vehicles. After a period of consolidation, the fleet maintenance industry is reduced to a handful of enterprises each directly serving one or more vehicle manufacturers. Scandal after scandal ensues as the non-existent market forces and ineffectual regulatory frameworks see maintenance standards plummet. The government is powerless to challenge the might of the vehicle manufacturers, whom have become indistinguishable from the omnipotent tech oligarchy running the planet…
Okay, maybe the last scenario has taken it a step too far but, hopefully, you get the point.

We can see that scenarios make the abstract (the future of the automotive aftermarket) tangible and, by providing specific detail, help to inform business model evolution. Note: in practice, any scenarios must be described with far more detail (including indications of timescales) and consideration than I have given here.


Hedges and bets
When evaluating each of the scenarios, we have to consider the likelihood and extent that each trend will arise. As such, scenario planning does not necessarily eliminate uncertainty, instead it helps businesses to better understand what changes they might need to make to their business models.

Within the scenarios presented above, it is possible for an independent workshop to make investment decisions that generate a win-win return across several scenarios. For example, we might feel that it is unlikely that the status quo (“A. Business as usual”) will continue and that any one of the other scenarios could be equally likely; in which case a business might hedge its bets by investing in vehicle manufacturer tools, training and service registration (including on-line diagnostics, technical information systems and security portals etc.), as well as seeking opportunities to grow fleet maintenance work. These investments can provide a return in all of the scenarios, whilst at the same time mitigating against the risks of not making the investments.

In summary, scenario planning can be a useful tool to counter the challenges faced within the rapidly changing automotive industry. Whilst it cannot eliminate uncertainty, it can certainly help an enterprise to identify worthwhile business model adaptations that will allow it to survive or thrive in the future.


Automotive Analytics
Find out more at: http://automotiveanalytics.net.



Related Articles

  • Certifying your future 

    The rate at which the modern car is developing to include new functions based on new technologies is exponential.

    The car owner is often unaware of this, as they see only the ‘HMI’ (human machine interface) that allows them to select and control functions and along with many other electronically controlled ‘things’, the expectation is that ‘it just works’.

    Two key elements are changing with today’s and tomorrow’s cars. Firstly, they are changing into more sophisticated, interactive electronic systems, which require high levels of software compliance. Frequently this can mean that the vehicle needs ‘updating’ which may apply to one system or the complete vehicle. Today this is increasingly conducted by using standardised interface (vehicle communication interfaces – VCI’s) and pass through programming by establishing a direct connection between the vehicle and the vehicle manufacturer’s website. This is now being used even at the level of replacing basic components, such as a battery or engine management system components.

    Secondly, vehicles are increasingly being connected through telematics systems so that the car is becoming part of ‘the internet of things’. This allows remote communication with the vehicle to provide a range of new services to the vehicle owner, driver, or occupants. These broadly fall into two categories – consumer related services, such as internet radio stations, link to e-mails, finding the nearest free parking space and much more, or business related access to in-vehicle data to allow remote monitoring of the status of the vehicle for predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, vehicle use, pay-as-you-drive insurance etc.

    Increasing isolation
    The in-vehicle E/E architecture is therefore not only increasingly complicated and inter-active, it is more vulnerable to incorrect repair processes. To ensure that this risk is minimised, the vehicle manufacturers are increasingly isolating any possible external connections from the in-vehicle communication buses and electronic control modules. Effectively, today’s 16 pin OBD connector will no longer be directly connected to the CAN Bus and in turn to the ECU(s) but will communicate via a secure in-vehicle gateway. There may also be a new standardised connection which becomes a local wireless connection in the workshop as well as having remote telematics connection, but in both cases, the access to in-vehicle data is no longer directly connected.
        
    Why is this isolation and protection of the in-vehicle systems so critical? Apart from the obvious protection against any malicious attack, there is an increasing safety issue. Thinking longer term, what happens when semi-autonomous cars or fully autonomous cars come into your workshop?
        
    The key question is how to conduct effective repairs on these vehicle systems. At first glance, it may be the basic servicing still needs to be done, but even this will become more difficult, with certain items already requiring electronic control or re-setting. As this develops into more sophisticated systems, the vehicle manufacturer may try and impose more control over who is doing what to ‘their’ vehicles, based on their claim that they have a lifetime responsibility of the functionality of the vehicle and therefore need to know who is doing what where and when. This may lead to an increasing requirement for independent operators to have some form of accreditation to ensure sufficient levels of technical competence before being allowed to work on a vehicle. However, there is also a strong argument in many European countries (the UK included) that this is a market forces issue and that it is the choice of the customer who they trust to repair their vehicle and it is the responsibility of the repairer to be adequately trained and equipped.

    What’s coming?
    Will this market forces attitude still continue when the autonomous vehicle systems are part of the intrinsic safety of the vehicle? This is increasingly becoming the case as these semi or fully autonomous systems take over more control of the vehicle and stop any driver control.
       
    Certainly, anyone attempting any DIY repair will find it much more difficult to access the information or the tools/equipment needed to repair their vehicle, as this will be beyond the knowledge and economic reach of the ‘Sunday morning repairer’, but should DIY repairs even be allowed in the future?

    This raises an interesting argument about who should be allowed to work on a vehicle as the correct repair procedures become increasingly critical. Of course, vehicle manufacturers will continue to have full access to the vehicle and it’s systems, which increasingly will be via remote (telematics) access. This may even compromise the access available to authorised repairers (main dealers), but is seen as a necessary requirement to ensure that the vehicle has been repaired correctly and that the in-vehicle software is still functioning correctly.

    The counter argument is that this also provides unacceptable levels of control and monitoring of the complete independent aftermarket – so what could be a solution?

    Controlling competition
    No one is trying to say that safety and security are not important, but there must be a balance as independent operators will continue to need access to diagnostic, repair, service and maintenance information and continue to offer competitive services to the consumer. The European legislator must protect competition, but this may also come with appropriate controls and this may mean that tomorrow’s technicians will need to demonstrate certain levels of competence, together with an audit trail of the work which has been performed in the event of a vehicle malfunction.

    Independent operators already need high levels of technical competence – necessary for the consumer and the effective operation of their own business, but in the future this may also mean a form of licensing or certification that is required by legislation. If this becomes necessary, then it has to be appropriate, reasonable and proportionate.

    The alternative is that the vehicle manufacturer could become the only choice to diagnose, service and repair the vehicles of tomorrow. I am sure we all agree that it is not what we want or need, so it may be that the increasing technology of tomorrow’s vehicles is the reason that the industry should now embrace change to mirror other safety related industry sectors, such as Gas Safe or NICEIC – qualified, competent and registered. The future is changing and the aftermarket needs to change with it.

    Want to know more?
    Find out how Neil’s consultancy for garage owners can benefit you by visiting xenconsultancy.com.

  • Connecting to tomorrow’s lean workshop 

    In a previous article, I had written about the fourth industrial revolution, but I suspect that this may not have been the most threatening topic that you were thinking about concerning your day-to-day workshop business – the business of diagnosing and repairing cars, using a range of workshop equipment and agreeing ‘partnership’ relationships for the technical data and replacement spare parts.

    The way that you work may have evolved over the years, mainly due to the increasing vehicle technology, but the basic principle has remained the same. You have customers who choose to come to you due to the good service and competitive pricing that you provide. However, the world of vehicle repair is changing and if you do not adapt, you will die. Unlike previous industrial revolutions, the pace of change is now much faster. So how is this going to impact the aftermarket?

    Approach
    The ‘internet of things’ (IOT) will change the approach to diagnostics, service and repair of vehicles, but also the way that the workshop equipment will be connected, the way that you handle your customers’ data and the way that you exchange data outside of the workshop, both as a consumer of data, but also as a data provider in data trading eco systems. All this will change the way that you do business. This might all sound like some science fiction concept, but this is already happening today with many vehicle manufacturers and their associated main dealer workshops. If the aftermarket does not start to develop the same approach and service offers, then it will not be able to compete.
        
    However, to understand this better, let’s start with today’s ‘classical business model’ and then see what will change. Today it all starts with your ability to directly communicate with both your customer and with their vehicle and (for the more difficult jobs once that vehicle is in the workshop) your ability to offer a competitive quotation.
        
    Once the vehicle is in your workshop, the diagnostic work or the replacement parts are identified, the parts ordered and the ‘complete repair process’ is conducted. However, there are three fundamental aspects to ensure that this process can be fulfilled – firstly, being in direct contact with the customer, secondly, being able to directly access their vehicle via the OBD plug and subsequently its data and thirdly, using that information to conduct
    the complete repair process in the workshop.

    Internet of things
    So, what is changing and how will the ‘IOT’ help to implement new and ‘lean’ business models to remain competitive? It will still all start with the ‘repair process’, but this will no longer be with the customer initially calling you or coming into the workshop with a question of ‘can you fix my car?’, but it will be through remote monitoring of the ‘thing’ – the vehicle (via OBD plug-in devices or in-vehicle telematics platforms) to conduct remote diagnostics, prognostics and predictive maintenance services. This will inform you when the vehicle needs work and should lead into being able to contact the customer and offer a competitive quotation for the work needed that ultimately should still result in the vehicle coming into the workshop.
        
    When the vehicle does arrive, you will already know the details of the vehicle and the necessary work, so can configure the workshop resources (which ramp, what workshop equipment, what technical data, what replacement parts etc.), before the vehicle arrives.
        
    You can also ensure that the various ‘external data’ that may be needed for the job is pre-arranged and can be downloaded into the specific workshop equipment which is needed as part of the repair process. This can be a ‘just in time’ download of the technical data, the diagnostic test routine, the replacement part fitment method and so on. All this can easily reduce the workshop time needed to complete the repair process by 50%.

    Captured
    This may already sound like a great move forward to be lean, more profitable and more competitive, but there is even more! You also now have new ways to use the data that you have captured. Not only will you know the faults of the specific make and model of vehicle, which in turn, you will store in your database (non-personal, machine generated data), but you will also be able to use this data to exchange or trade data with your existing suppliers or other (new) partners to reduce both your costs and theirs. Welcome to the world of data trading – and get used to it, because it will be your future.  The internet of things, means linking to the ‘thing’ (e.g. the vehicle and workshop equipment) and then handling the data created, by using it in new ways to make the whole workshop and vehicle repair process more efficient, as well as supporting new business models beyond just what you can do today in the workshop. However, let’s also take a step back and look at workshop equipment as part of ‘the internet of things’. It already starts with a new range of ‘connected’ workshop equipment that will not only be able to be remotely monitored by the equipment manufacturer to ensure better reliability, together with faster and cheaper repairs, but will also be the basis for ensuring that the technical information you require for the job ‘in hand’ is supplied not only ‘just in time’, but also charged for on a new competitive bidding basis from a range of suppliers and charged on an individual job basis. Going a stage further, you may be able to exchange data with your equipment suppliers so that they can collect ‘big data’ from all their customers and use it for their own new data trading business models and in turn, use this to offset supplying data or services to you at
    a lower cost. This may also apply with your parts suppliers to provide them with better forecasting and trend analysis.

    Data centric
    The classic business model of today that is ‘customer centric’ will change to become ‘data centric’ that creates added value to the consumer’s experience, but also to the service provider – you!

    This change of accessing the vehicle, your customer and use of the vehicle-generated data is a disruptive evolution that will drive (no pun intended) a revolution in the aftermarket. However, the key issue will be the ability to access the vehicle, its data and in-vehicle displays to offer your services when the vehicle needs work and that is likely to be a legislative issue as the vehicle manufacturers try to use their technological advantage to dominate and control tomorrow’s repair and maintenance business. It’s up to you to fight not only for your ‘right to do business’, but for your ability to evolve your current business models into those of tomorrow.

  • Klarius increases UK manufacturing capacity 

    Recent investment has provided Klarius with increased manufacturing capacity for automotive OEM and aftermarket emission control products including exhausts, CATs and DPFs.

  • Top Garage 2018 winner named – Cedar Garage 


    Top Garage 2018 has named its winner. Cedar Garage of Worthing was identified as the best business in the brand new competition, which launched this year.

  • The future is digital 

    By Phil Curry

Most read content


Search

Sign Up

For the latest news and updates from Aftermarket Magazine.


Poll

Where should the next Automechanika show be held?



Facebook


©DFA Media 1999-2018